{"id":569,"date":"2011-02-14T17:30:46","date_gmt":"2011-02-14T17:30:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/larealproperties.wordpress.com\/?p=569"},"modified":"2011-02-14T17:30:46","modified_gmt":"2011-02-14T17:30:46","slug":"luxury-home-sales-jump-21-in-california","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jurus.net\/juliemeggat\/luxury-home-sales-jump-21-in-california\/","title":{"rendered":"Luxury home sales jump 21% in California"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>California homes priced at $1 million or more experienced a sales boom in 2010, the first increase in five years, even as overall home sales in the state declined, a real estate information service reported. The reason: High-end home shoppers went bargain hunting as certain parts of the economy improved but luxury home prices remained depressed.<\/p>\n<p>Last year, 22,529 homes sold statewide for $1 million-plus, a 21% increase from 2009, according to DataQuick Information Systems in San Diego. In contrast, the total number of California homes sold last year dropped 9%.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Prestige home buyers respond to a different set of motivations than the rest of us. Their decisions are less dependent on jobs, prices and interest rates, and more on how their portfolio is doing,&#8221; DataQuick President John Walsh said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;When the financial world was full of uncertainty a couple of years back, and the jumbo-loan market dried up, luxury sales plummeted. As the economy started its top-down recovery, some wealthy buyers went looking for a bargain,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>Savvy shoppers trying to time the market swooped in before discounted prices could turn the corner.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Certainly, we&#8217;re pretty sure we&#8217;re at the bottom&#8221; for home prices, said economist Christopher Thornberg, principal with Beacon Economics in Los Angeles.<\/p>\n<p>Even if prices fall further, he said, &#8220;if you are borrowing, buying today makes a lot of sense because interest rates are just incredibly low.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Two other reasons for the $1-million-and-up market increase are the return of the jumbo mortgage market in 2010 and a comeback in the stock market, which saw huge losses in 2009, Thornberg said. &#8220;A lot of folks who were reeling from equity losses bounced back.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Cash purchases also inched upward among $1-million buyers last year to 29.4% of sales, up from 28.9% in 2009 and the highest for any year since 1994. But even cash purchases can be motivated by low interest rates.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;A lot of cash offers are done on the basis of the person trying to get a leg up and then they turn around and refi,&#8221; Thornburg said.<\/p>\n<p>Million-dollar-plus sales hit a high of 54,773 in 2005 and then dropped through 2009. Last year&#8217;s sales increase came despite a winnowing in the category; 3,380 of the homes that sold statewide for less than $1 million had previously sold for $1 million or more, DataQuick analysis shows.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There are not as many million-dollar homes kicking around as there were during the boom years,&#8221; Thornberg said.<\/p>\n<p>L.A.-area real estate offices also noticed the uptick in $1-million-plus sales.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I think last year there were a lot of buyers who said now is the best time to buy,&#8221; said Jeffrey Hyland, president of Hilton &amp; Hyland, whose Beverly Hills office doubled its dollar volume from 2009. &#8220;We noticed it on the high end.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>His office, for example, sold seven houses for more than $20 million last year.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s a good sign to the market of where we are&#8221; that high net-worth buyers are making purchases, Hyland said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s like those people don&#8217;t read the doom and gloom&#8221; news reports, he said.<\/p>\n<p>Plus, the rich do often get richer. &#8220;Some people are more wealthy now than they were before,&#8221; Hyland said.<\/p>\n<p>Most of the high-end sales, 79%, fell between $1 million and $2 million. The median-size home in the million-dollar-plus category was 2,840 square feet, with 4 bedrooms and 3 bathrooms, and the median price paid per square foot was $601, down 0.6% from $605 in 2009. For the overall California housing market, the median price per square foot was $164 in 2010, up 10.1% from $149 in 2009, DataQuick said.<\/p>\n<p>The most expensive confirmed purchase statewide last year, based on public records, was a 35,000-square-foot-plus mansion on 2.2 acres in Bel-Air that sold for $50 million.<\/p>\n<p>But not all mega-deals are subject to the bright light of public curiosity, if buyer and seller employ legal sleight of hand.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;A lot of the sales \u2026 may not appear on public records,&#8221; Hyland said of the most expensive transactions.<\/p>\n<p>So the number of $1-million-plus sales, he said, could be even greater than reported.<\/p>\n<p>Source: LA Times 2011<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>California homes priced at $1 million or more experienced a sales boom in 2010, the first increase in five years, even as overall home sales in the state declined, a real estate information service reported. The reason: High-end home shoppers went bargain hunting as certain parts of the economy improved but luxury home prices remained [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[156],"tags":[153,1115,157,12,75,106],"class_list":["post-569","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-beverly-hills-real-estate","tag-beverly-hills-homes-for-sale","tag-beverly-hills-real-estate","tag-beverly-hills-real-estate-agent","tag-hollywood-hills-real-estate-agent","tag-julie-kryukova","tag-julie-kryukova-real-estate-agent"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurus.net\/juliemeggat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/569","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurus.net\/juliemeggat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurus.net\/juliemeggat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurus.net\/juliemeggat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurus.net\/juliemeggat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=569"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jurus.net\/juliemeggat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/569\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurus.net\/juliemeggat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=569"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurus.net\/juliemeggat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=569"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurus.net\/juliemeggat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=569"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}